Follow the Definition: Currency Leads to the Truth and the Deception

According to Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, currency is defined as “coined money and such bank notes or other paper money as are authorized by law and do in fact circulate from hand-to-hand as the medium of exchange.”

Money is described as “…gold, silver or paper money used as [a] circulating medium of exchange, [a]nd does not embrace notes, bonds, evidences of debt or other personal or real estate.” Pull from your wallet a dollar bill. What does it say at the top on the face in bold, white, capital letters? FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE. If your dollar is a note, then by definition, it cannot be money.

The third statement written on the dollar announces that this “NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE.” What is “legal tender?” Interestingly, Black’s Law Dictionary does not contain the phrase “legal tender.” The word “legal,” as defined by the same source means, “conforming to the law” and “tender” is described as “an offer of money; the act by which one produces and offers to a person holding a claim or demand against him the amount of money which he considers and admits to be due, in satisfaction of such [a] claim or demand, without any stipulation or condition.” The face of the US dollar states that public and private debt can be LEGALLY TENDERED with this FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE, but the law delineates that these notes are not money. So what are they? The math is simple. Debt pays debt. Servants are indebted to a master. The notes of the Federal Reserve [master] transact debt on behalf of the master’s public [servant].

Black’s Dictionary defines a note as “a unilateral instrument containing an express and absolute promise of [the] signer to pay a specified person or order, or bearer, a definite sum of money at a specified time.” The dollar I am holding is signed by the Treasury Secretary Steven Terner Mneuchin and US Treasurer Jovita Carranza. These public officials bear the responsibility for the promise of this unilateral (“one-sided, ex-parte; having a relation to only one of two or more persons or things”) instrument. However, this responsibility for the promise of a debt is the work of an overseer; an employee paid to control servants on behalf of a master or natural human beings unlawfully enslaved. What owner is responsible for the crime of slavery in the United States of America? If Americans are earning and spending their wages in debt on food, shelter, clothing, transportation, and education, then these are the actions of a debtor, a servant. What therefore is the difference between a servant and a slave?

A “servant” is described as “[o]ne employed to service master’s affairs, whose physical conduct in performance of the service is controlled or is subject to right to control by the master” whereas a “slave” is defined as “[a] person who is wholly subject to the will of another; one who has no freedom of action, but whose person and services are wholly under the control of another” and “One who is under the power of a master who belongs to him; so that the master may sell and dispose of this person, of his industry and of his labor, without his being able to do anything, or acquire anything, but what must belong to his master.”

What pray tell therefore is a “master?” “A principal who employs another in the service of his affairs and who controls or has a right to control physical conduct of another in performance of that service. One having authority; one who rules, directs, instructs, or superintends; A head or chief, an instructor, an employer. Applied to several judicial officers.”

Yet an “owner” is simply “[t]he person in whom is vested the ownership, dominion or title of property; proprietor. He who has dominion of a thing…” where “a thing” is or “things” are defined as “[t]he objects of dominion or property as contradistinguished from ’persons.’” The United States, whether thirteen or fifty-two, cannot dominate or own as property persons, at least not legally because men and women are natural persons with attributable rights and duties.

A “person” is “[a] man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the right to the rank he holds in society, with all the right to which the place he holds entitles him, and all the duties. The word in its natural and usual signification includes women as well as men. [The t]erm may include artificial beings, as corporations….It may include partnerships…. ’Persons’ are of two kinds: natural and artificial. A natural person is a human being….in a legislative act, natural persons will be intended unless something appear in the context to show it belongs to artificial persons….a county is a person in a legal sense….

A person is such, not because he is human, but because rights and duties are ascribed to him. The person is the legal subject or substance of which the rights and duties are attributes. An individual considered as having such attributes is what lawyers call a natural person.”

The United States Constitution is therefore void as it relates to the master-slave relationship because there is no legal basis for this criminal mandate and its corresponding slave economy except that this document invokes the Vatican’s Doctrine of Discovery which is still in force to this day.

According to the Merriam Webster Dictionary and not a dictionary of law, currency is “a medium of exchange” and “barter” such that no mention is made of gold, silver or notes, bonds, labor or evidence of debt; dollars. Step outside of legal parlance and the dollar appears just fine supporting the fiat delusion in which citizens of all nations live.

In law, it is gold and silver that are considered as money. All other forms of payment are debt instruments utilized by servants and slaves.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *